Borderfire Report

Illegal Immigration News And Political Commentary

 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
  • default color
  • green color
  • blue color

"Miranda Rights" for Intrusive Census Questions?

E-mail Print PDF

Satire by John W. Lillpop

Thinking back to the sight of civilians jumping from the Twin Towers to escape death by fire on September John W. Lillpop11, 2001, how would you have answered the following question the next day?

"Given the horrific events of yesterday, what sort of punishment do you expect America to use in dealing with terrorists and suspected terrorists captured on the battlefield in the future?"

Circle the answer that most closely matches your expectations:

A. They will be subjected to mass executions without trial, civilian or military;

B. They will detained at a fortified US military base such as Gutananmo Bay, where they will isolated as "enemy combatants" to assure the safety and well being of American citizens; or

C. They will be advised of their Miranda rights and brought to American cities and tried in civilian courts.

Who in his or her right mind would have circled "C" eight years ago?

Yet, here we sit, in precisely that situation after electing an arrogant, wrong-minded leftist president, buttressed by an equally contemptible Congress.

Consequently, what would have been unthinkable just a few short years ago has transcended common sense and logic to become a bizarre reality!

Because of the esteem with which felons, especially ACORN volunteers, are held by Barack Obama and the Democrat Party, there is a growing concern about another problem, which although not nearly as grave as a terrorist attack, poses a significant threat to the American people.

At issue is the integrity of the 2010 Census among people who fear political manipulation and outright fraud.

Perhaps We the People need the equivalent of "Miranda Rights" for dealing with Census takers and their intrusive questions?

Miranda generally confers protection upon those being held against their will with language such as this:

"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights?"

Given the fascism in the White House and Congress, why not require that when that Census Taker knocks on your door, he or she be obligated to advise you of the following:

"The US Constitution requires an "enumeration" every 10 years. Enumerate means count.

"You have the right to remain silent after answering one basic question: How many people live here?

"Any information that your provide beyond that can, and will be, used against you by the US government."

How does that sound? Fair and balanced and likely to be passed and signed into law?

A more likely scenario would have the Census Felon handing you a letter signed by Obama, Pelosi, and Reid stating:

"The US Constitution requires that, for your protection, prosperity, and freedom, you be fitted with a microchip to track your movement at all times. This is essential in providing you with immediate access to all the financial and social benefits owed you, regardless of your immigration status or other superfluous categorization.

"All US microchips are preceded by three digits, 666, which signify ONLY that you are a blessed treasure and worthy of the American Dream. Other nations have other symbols, but because you are special, 666 has been reserved for you.

"The Constitution also requires that Census pollsters ask you 1,349 simple questions to determine how we can help you better.

"For example, if you earn $10,000 a year and another family across town earns $10,000 a week, we need to find a way to "spread the wealth" as brother Obama says.

"Refusing to answer all 1,411 questions (updated total) honestly and completely, and or refusing to accept implantation of the assigned microchip here and now, is a very serious crime, punishable by on the spot waterboarding.

"Thank you for your patriotic support!"

John W. Lillpop: San Jose, California

We Invite You To Visit John's Website:

Send Feedback to John:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

John W. Lillpop Archives


 


Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
Disclaimer:  This website has no responsibility for the views, opinions and information communicated here.The contributors and news providers are fully responsible for their content. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Borderfire Report.

Other Resources News Headlines

Banished! City forbids Bible studies in homes Banished! City forbids Bible studies in homes

The city of Gilbert, Ariz., has ordered a group of seven adults to stop gathering for Bible studies in a private home because such meetings are forbidden by the city's zoning codes.
Bob Unruh / WorldNetDaily - Full Story


 
Concerns in Bloody Border Battle Concerns in Bloody Border Battle

Homeland Security: Mexican drug cartels infiltrating U.S. Border Patrol..
Fox News - Video


 
Mexican Military Incursion In Texas Mexican Military Incursion In Texas

These sorts of invasions by Mexico’s corrupt military, long on the drug cartel payroll, have been going on for years but the timing of this incursion is especially alarming since it occurred on the same week that Homeland Security officials revealed Mexican drug cartels are rapidly infiltrating fede...

 
County Spends 600 Million On Welfare For Illegal Aliens County Spends 600 Million On Welfare For Illegal Aliens

For the second consecutive year taxpayers in a single U.S. county will dish out more than half a billion dollars just to cover the welfare and food-stamp costs of illegal immigrants.
Corruption Chronicles - Full Story


 
Bill requires U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA Bill requires U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA

A coalition of 27 lawmakers from across the political spectrum is sponsoring a bill to withdraw the U.S. from the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, in as little as six months.
Chelsea Schilling / WorldNetDaily - Full Story


 
Why Did Obama Administration Drop Immigration Charges Against Agriprocessors’ Rubashkin? Why Did Obama Administration Drop Immigration Charges Against Agriprocessors’ Rubashkin?

The Obama Administration’s excuse was that it had convicted Rubashkin  on other charges, relating to his financial rather than immigration crimes...
James Fulford / VDARE - Full Story


 
change